This legislation would extend for an additional year—to December 2013—a pay freeze on federal workers agreed to by President Obama and Congress that is scheduled to end at the end of 2012. The wage freeze would apply to employees in both the executive and legislative branches.
In supporting the legislation, Rep. Sean P. Duffy, R-Wis., cited a report by the Congressional Budget Office released two days before the vote that concluded that many federal workers, particularly those at the lower end of the income scale, received on average higher wages and benefits than private sector workers with similar education and types of positions.
"On [February 1], the Congressional Budget Office released a study which found that total compensation for Federal employees was 16 percent greater than for private sector workers. When they looked at the benefits of hardworking taxpayers, they take home 72 percent less in benefits than their government counterparts," Duffy said. (The 72 percent figure only applied to workers with a high school diploma or less; the actual average difference in benefits for people from all education levels was actually 48 percent, with the difference ranging from 46 percent for those with a bachelor's degree to as little as 2 percent for those with a professional degree or doctorate.)
"As Americans continue to sacrifice, we must lead by example. H.R. 3835 continues the temporary freeze on across-the-board annual salary adjustments for Federal civilian workers," Duffy said.
Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., spoke in opposition to the pay freeze. "Despite the critical nature of the services that Federal workers provide, the majority believes that their pay should be frozen for yet another year, that their retirement benefits should be slashed, and that the size of the Federal workforce should be reduced sharply, even though it is smaller now than it was under Presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush.
"Federal workers have already made tremendous sacrifices to address our Nation's budget deficits. The 2-year pay freeze to which they are currently subject will save taxpayers $60 billion. Further, Federal workers face the possibility of layoffs and furloughs in coming years as automatic spending reductions mandated by the Budget Control Act of 2011 reduce agency budgets for salaries.
"The only workable solution to our country's budget deficit is a balanced one that includes shared sacrifice, including from the wealthiest among us. To date, however, our Republican majority has yet to bring before this House a single bill that will require millionaires and billionaires to contribute more toward deficit reduction. Instead, they are preoccupied with taking money out of the pockets of middle-class public servants."
The bill passed the House, 309-117. Among Republicans, 237 voted in favor, two opposed, and two did not vote. Among Democrats, 72 voted in favor, 115 voted against, and four did not vote.
The Middle-Class Position:
The right-wing blogosphere is positively giddy about this, especially in the wake of a Congressional Budget Office study that said that as a whole federal employees do get somewhat better pay and benefits than many of their private sector counterparts. "Federal Workers Overpaid, and CBO Agrees," reads the Heritage Foundation's blog, The Foundry. "Federal Workers Earning More Than Those Paying Their Salaries," harrumphs Red State.
The right wants the rest of us to join the gripe session about overpaid federal bureaucrats. But consider the facts about federal workers—and what's been happening to the rest of the workforce.
If you only have a high school diploma or perhaps a community college education, a federal government job is indeed a good deal, where you can earn significantly higher wages and benefits than you can in the private sector. Your wages will on average be 21 percent higher and benefits package worth on average 72 percent more. But those with advanced degrees are more likely to have higher total earnings in the private sector; on average workers with doctorates only receive 2 percent more in total compensation, only because a richer benefit package helps offset lower wages. (And while there's a ceiling on federal government wages, no such ceiling exists in the private sector.)
The CBO study adds, by the way, that "much of the higher benefit cost incurred by the federal
government stems from differences in retirement benefits," with many federal workers receiving defined-benefit retirement plans and retirees receiving health coverage, benefits now rare in the private sector.
It's worth noting what these employees are doing. One chart in the CBO report reminds us that more than a third of the federal workforce is employed by the Defense Department. Add the Department of Homeland Security, Veterans Affairs and the Justice Department, and that works out to about 63 percent of the federal workforce. Many of these employees are taking on responsibilities that require a higher level of skill than what is required in the private sector; it's no wonder that a higher percentage of the federal workforce is comprised of people with advanced degrees than the private sector as a whole; and correspondingly a much lower percentage of the federal workforce is comprised of people with only a high school diploma.
The bottom line is that there is often good reason for some federal workers to earn more than some of us who pay their salaries.
But the even more important point is that those of us who pay their salaries should be doing better.
The Commerce Department reported last month that average hourly earnings, adjusted for inflation and seasonal factors, fell 0.9 percent from December 2010 to December 2011. That's a consequence of private sector workers cutting wages, or workers being forced into jobs that pay less than the jobs they lost. The total share of national income devoted to wages and salaries, historically above 50 percent, fell to 49.6 percent in the first quarter of 2011 even as corporate profits rose, as Floyd Norris of The New York Times noted in an August 2011 article. Meanwhile, as Sam Pizzigati notes, citing Congressional Budget Office research, the share of the national income going to the top 1 percent increased from 8 percent in 1979 to 17 percent in 2007.
Last year the Commerce Department published a survey of private-sector employee benefits that showed that 36 percent of private sector workers did not have access to a retirement plan, 31 percent did not have access to a work health insurance plan, and 40 percent did not have paid sick leave.
The success that corporations and conservatives have had in weakening unions, and thus disempowering workers, has had a devastating effect on the wages and benefits of private sector workers, as labor writer James Parks reported, citing a National Sociological Review study. The response from the right has been calls to push down wages even further, by eliminating minimum wage laws and generally cheerleading downward the pressure on wages that comes with a race with China and other Asian industrial countries to the bottom.
That's why private sector workers ought not be aligning themselves with the resent-the-federal-worker crowd. That crowd is not interested in you doing better. They are supporting the policies that are causing all workers to be worse off. What federal workers get in pay and benefits—and thus in overall income security—should be the standard for what all workers should be fighting to receive. Allowing conservatives to get us caught in their crabs-in-a-barrel game will only mean we'll all be at the bottom of the barrel.
Our researchers and writers continually analyze how congressional actions affect middle-class households and which members of Congress deserve a “thumbs up” for their vote. Support the people working to keep you informed.
Search our analyses of legislation
significant to America’s current and
aspiring middle class, and find out
how members of Congress voted on
those bills.
By Keyword
By Legislator
By Bill
Issues
THEMIDDLECLASS.ORG
TheMiddleClass.org keeps you informed on what your representatives in Congress are doing that affects the current and aspiring middle class and gives you the facts you need to hold them accountable. Read More