Bill Statistics

The Middle Class Position

The middle class supports.

How They Voted

96% with middle class
0% against middle class
4% did not vote
Pie Chart

Grades

Grade A
Senate

The Senate receives a grade of A for its support of the middle class on this piece of legislation.

95 Senators voted for the middle-class position; 0 voted against.

Grade A
House

The House receives a grade of A for its support of the middle class on this piece of legislation.

414 Representatives voted for the middle-class position; 1 voted against.

H.R. 493

Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008

Introduced:
01.16.2007 [House]
Signed into Law: 05.21.2008
Senate: Yea-95, Nay-0
House: Yea-414, Nay-1
The Legislation: 

The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) prohibits group and individual health insurers from requesting or requiring genetic tests from beneficiaries. The bill bans the use of genetic information to determine plan eligibility and establish premiums. Similarly, the legislation prohibits employers from requesting or requiring genetic testing and bans the use of genetic information to make hiring and promotion decisions and to determine eligibility for training programs. The act does not extend to individuals who show signs or symptoms of disease. Finally, the bill strengthens Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulations regarding genetic information in order to improve privacy protections that prevent misuse of health information.

The Middle-Class Position: 

Middle Class Supports. Although cases of discrimination based on genetic testing are rare, as genetic testing becomes more widespread the risk that middle-class Americans who depend on health insurance could be denied insurance coverage or be terminated from a job solely for being at genetic risk for a disease is troubling. The legislation will facilitate the individualized approaches to health care that mapping the genome has made possible. Additionally, the bill would bolster popular support for genetic research by alleviating Americans’ fears of discrimination. Limiting the act’s prohibitions to use by employers and insurance companies would not stifle innovation in genetic research.

From the Experts: 

“[T]he science of genomic medicine is rocketing forward. But fear of genetic discrimination threatens to slow both the advance of such groundbreaking biomedical research and the integration of the fruits of that research into our nation’s health care. If individuals continue to worry that they will be denied health insurance or refused employment because they have a predisposition to a particular disease, they may forego genetic testing that could help guide medical professionals to lessen their risk, simply because the test identifies them as having such a predisposition. This is about all of us, as there are no perfect specimens at the DNA level; each one of us carries numerous gene variants that increase our risk of developing one disease or another. Therefore, each one of us is at risk for genetic discrimination.”
– Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D., Director of the National Human Genome Research Institute (3/8/2007)

“HR 493 very clearly and very specifically safeguards the ability of healthcare providers to use the latest genetic tests and genetic medicines to take care of their patients [and] has solid and well-reasoned protections for research…[By] providing strong protections against the misuse of genetic information, HR 493 allows researchers to explain clearly to potential research participants that it is simply against the law for health insurers or employers to use genetic information to alter health insurance coverage or affect employment.”
– Kathy Hudson, Ph.D., Genetics and Public Policy Center (3/8/2007)

Beyond this Bill: 

The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ensures that fear of discrimination will not enter into everyday Americans’ calculus of what medical care to seek. The legislation must be strictly enforced to ensure that individuals remain confident in the privacy of their genetic information when used for both medical and research purposes.

Maine New Hampshire Vermont Massachusetts Rhode Island Connecticut New York New Jersey Pennsylvania Delaware Maryland West Virginia North Carolina South Carolina Georgia Florida Alabama Mississippi Tennessee Virginia Kentucky Ohio Indiana Michigan Illinois Wisconsin Louisiana Arkansas Missouri Iowa Minnesota Oklahoma Kansas Nebraska South Dakota North Dakota Texas Colorado New Mexico Arizona Utah Wyoming Hawaii Alaska Montana Nevada Idaho California Oregon Washington