Bill Statistics
The Middle Class Position
How They Voted
Grades
The Senate receives a grade of C for its support of the middle class on this piece of legislation.
60 Senators voted for the middle-class position; 38 voted against.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2009
- Consumers
- Health Care
- Health insurance tax credit
- HMOs and insurance companies
- Hospitals
- Medicaid
- Medical research
- Medicare
- Prescription drugs
- Public health
- SCHIP
- Single-payer
- Tax Fairness
- Universal health care
11.19.2009 [House]
Sen. Harry Reid [D-NV]
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act reforms the health care system by expanding the availability of health insurance, regulating health insurance coverage, and restructuring health care delivery, including how it is paid for. The bill would reduce the number of uninsured Americans by 31 million, leaving only 6 percent of nonelderly adults uninsured. A number of different mechanisms are used to increase coverage, including expanding Medicaid, which provides insurance to low-income parents and children at very small cost; establishing state-based insurance exchanges with subsidies for low- and middle-income households; requiring individuals to obtain coverage; and mandating that most employers offer health insurance.
- The legislation would make Medicaid available to all individuals earning less than 133 percent of the federal poverty line, or $14,500 a year ($29,500 for a family of four) while improving services for beneficiaries.
- The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act also creates state-based health insurance exchanges, called Health Benefit Exchanges, which are marketplaces where consumers can shop for and purchase health insurance.
- The Medicaid expansion and the Health Benefit Exchanges work together with an individual “mandate” and an employer fee to increase the number of insured Americans.
- The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act includes numerous reforms of the health insurance market, in many cases regulating this market for the first time.
- The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act also reforms Medicaid and Medicare to improve care and limit cost.
The bill includes funding for comparative effectiveness research, community health initiatives, wellness and preventive health services, public health infrastructure, and training for primary care health professionals.
The legislation, which the Congressional Budget Office finds will reduce the budget deficit by $132 billion over ten years, will be paid for by the changes to Medicare described above; by fees on pharmaceutical companies, medical device manufacturers, and health insurance providers; by an excise tax on tanning services; and by an excise tax of 40 percent on insurance companies for health plans worth more than $8,500 for an individual and $23,000 for a family (the tax would only be applied to dollar amounts above and beyond these thresholds). The legislation permits health insurance to be sold in multiple states when states agree to allow this, a practice that is currently prohibited.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act does not extend health insurance coverage to undocumented immigrants. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that about 8 million such persons would remain uninsured. Additionally, the bill restricts access to abortion services in the Health Benefits Exchanges and, in particular, for people receiving federal subsidies.
Middle Class Supports. Access to health care is a critical component of a middle-class standard of living. Skyrocketing health care costs have created a vicious and destabilizing trap for middle-class Americans in which employer-sponsored coverage is offered less frequently and private coverage is increasingly unaffordable. Meanwhile, successful public programs that effectively cover children (SCHIP), the poor (Medicaid), and the elderly (Medicare) are unavailable to middle-class adults. Almost 46 million nonelderly Americans lack health insurance, the majority of whom are low- and middle-income, and the rate of the uninsured has grown significantly since 2000. At the same time, the average worker’s health care premium has increased 128% (to $3,515) since 1999. One study even found that just shy of two thirds of all bankruptcies are due to medical expenses even though the vast majority of these bankruptcies involve families who have health insurance. Because employers, too, have had to absorb similar premium increases, employer-sponsored insurance – the type of insurance most middle-class Americans obtain – has declined significantly in each of the last eight years. The economic downturn has exacerbated this situation and experts estimate that each percentage point increase in the unemployment rate results in substantial increases in the number of uninsured Americans. Given the high costs of obtaining insurance in the private, non-group market, which is nearly impossible without steady employment, many Americans have simply given up coverage over the last several years. In short, a perfect storm of increasing health care costs and a down economy has undermined the financial stability and endangered the wellbeing of the middle class and the aspiring middle class.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act would do much to relieve the financial stress placed on these households by high health insurance costs while also extending health coverage to millions of Americans. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill would reduce the number of uninsured to 23 million, leaving just 6 percent of the population without health coverage. Expanding Medicaid to cover low-income adults is one of the most effective and cost-efficient means of covering more aspiring middle-class Americans. The expansion would enroll about 15 million individuals in Medicaid, providing an important public backstop for aspiring middle-class families. Indeed, public programs have successfully kept millions of children from becoming uninsured, while the lack of such programs for low-income childless adults has led to increased numbers of the uninsured among this population. Similarly, subsidized coverage in the Health Benefits Exchanges would reduce health care costs for tens of millions of households. Premium savings could be as high as $10,000 for a low-income household of four. Such savings are targeted at the very groups that need the most help.
At the same time as it helps reduce health care costs for middle-class and aspiring middle-class Americans, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act greatly improves health coverage by enacting strict requirements for the type of insurance that is offered. The bill prevents the nightmare scenarios of being denied coverage just because you have become sick or being forced to pay higher premiums because of a preexisting condition (in many policies, being a woman is effectively considered a preexisting condition). Eventually, it will define minimum benefits and cost limits that must be included in most health insurance plans, not just ones offered by the Health Benefits Exchanges. And it will ensure that health insurers do not use premiums to pay for administrative costs and profits, instead of medical care. In this way, affordable and adequate health insurance that protects individuals and their families during both normal medical events and extraordinary medical hardship will be available to all aspiring middle-class and middle-class households.
Finally, the Act contains cost-cutting strategies to reduce the impact of health care costs on the budget deficit and additional measures to reorient health care delivery to quality, preventive care and away from costly and unnecessary overtreatment. Eliminating overpayments to Medicare Advantage, the ill-advised, Bush-era privatization of a chunk of Medicare and a tax on expensive health insurance plans, which is likely to result in fewer such plans being offered, are effective ways to cut costs without weakening coverage.
“The Senate bill protects the guaranteed benefits that people in Medicare rely on, and makes progress toward ending the rampant discriminatory tactics used by insurers to deny coverage to those who need it most.”
–Nancy LeaMond, Vice President, AARP (December 21, 2009)
“All Americans deserve affordable, high-quality health coverage so they can get the medical care they need – and this bill advances many of our priority issues for achieving the vision of a health system that works for patients and physicians. Lifetime limits on health coverage will be a thing of the past – as will higher premiums based on medical conditions or gender. These are important benefits for those who have insurance now – and those who want it but have been unable to get it.”
–Cecil B. Wilson, M.D., President-elect, American Medical Association (December 21, 2009)
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is a momentous step forward in a complex debate about how best to expand and improve health care coverage in the United States. While the reforms included in the legislation are robust, future versions of the legislation should quicken the pace of implementation – many of the provisions, including the expansion of Medicaid and the opening of the Health Benefits Exchanges do not occur for several years – and work to expand access to the Exchanges for as many Americans as possible. Ensuring that everyone who wants access to plans in the Health Insurance Exchange has access should be a goal of future versions, rather than imposing strict limits on eligibility. The articulation of a robust minimum benefits plan in the Exchange and close vigilance of the health insurance plans offered outside the Exchange are critical components of the legislation’s success. Without effective implementation, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will not accomplish its twin goals of expanding coverage and increasing affordability, but will also fall short of its lofty objective of cutting health care costs.
Unfortunately, the Senate version of health care reform falls short of the House’s version in many respects. First among these shortcomings is that the Senate bill expands insurance to 5 million fewer people than the House legislation. The Senate bill also lacks the so-called public option, a government-run insurance plan that could compete with private insurers and drive down health care costs. Furthermore, the Senate bill includes a smaller expansion of Medicaid; continues to exempt insurance companies from antitrust regulations that help the industry exercise monopoly authority; includes less stringent regulations, particularly with respect to out-of-pocket expenses; and generally delays implementation of the bill’s most important provisions beyond the already sluggish implementation timetable set out by the House’s bill.
Finally, the legislation erects significant impediments for low-income and middle-class women seeking to obtain health coverage that includes coverage for abortions, while preserving the ability of the wealthy to get the care they need. This provision stands in stark contrast to most of the bill, which is designed to expand access to health services to all.
