Video Summary

Bill Statistics

The Middle Class Position

The middle class supports.

How They Voted

59% with middle class
38% against middle class
3% did not vote
Pie Chart

Grades

Grade C
House

The House receives a grade of C for its support of the middle class on this piece of legislation.

256 Representatives voted for the middle-class position; 163 voted against.

Share This Report Card

HR 12. (Pay equality) On passing a bill that would make it easier for workers to challenge wage discrimination/On passing the bill

Introduced:
01.06.2009 [House]
The Legislation: 

This vote was on passing a bill that would make it easier for workers to challenge wage discrimination in court.  It would require any employer seeking to justify unequal pay to prove that the disparity was job-related and required by some necessity of their business.  It also would prohibit employers from retaliating against employees who disclose salary information with their co-workers.  It also would allow workers who won wage discrimination cases to collect compensatory and punitive damages.

Republicans complained bitterly that the change would invite a host of new discrimination lawsuits by lawyers eager to collect fees. 

It "will breed litigation in other ways as well, from encouraging class action lawsuits to expanding liability," said Buck McKeon, R-Calif.

By a vote of 256-163, the House passed the bill.  All but 10 Republicans present voted against the bill.  All but three Democrats present voted for the bill.  The end result is that the House passed a bill that would make it easier for workers to sue employers for wage discrimination.  It was later paired with a related wage discrimination bill (see vote 9).

The Middle-Class Position: 

The Middle Class Supports. Despite improvement in compensation disparity between men and women since the passage of the Equal Pay Act in 1963, the wage gap still persists. Women make approximately 77 cents for every dollar earned by a man. In 2006, the median income of men was $42,261 while that of women was only $32,515. The disparity is even greater for minority women. A recent report by the American Association of University Women found that discrimination is a significant factor contributing to the pay gap between men and women. Further, American households increasingly rely on a woman’s paycheck to make ends meet: the median contribution of a woman to her household was 35.1% of the total in 2005. Legislation to end discriminatory pay practices is necessary to ensure that aspiring middle-class and middle-class Americans do not lose wages that are necessary to afford the health insurance, college education, and everyday necessities that compose a middle-class standard of living. The Paycheck Fairness Act will allow employees to seek redress from wage discrimination more easily, while protecting them from employer retaliation. Allowing employees to seek compensatory and punitive damages provides both the best means to compensate employees who have been discriminated against and a powerful incentive for employers not to discriminate based on gender in the first place.

Finally, collecting more information from employers about wage rates will allow citizen groups, non-profit organizations, and public agencies refine statistics on the pay gap and develop more effective policies to eliminate it.

From the Experts: 

“The Paycheck Fairness Act…is a major victory for women, as it is the most important piece of pay equity legislation to pass in decades…The bill…could help women make real progress toward reducing the 23 percent differential in pay between women and men. Sex-based pay discrimination means much more than 23 cents on the dollar -- it can mean hundreds of thousands of dollars over a woman's lifetime that are lost to her and her family. These lost wages can mean the family is unable to afford college tuition or health insurance, and the lowered pensions and social security payments associated with lower income can lead to poverty for elderly women who were not able to save and invest for retirement.”
– Kim Gandy, President, Nation Organization for Women, 8/1/2008

“Forty-five years after passage of the Equal Pay Act, it is shocking, and totally unacceptable, that women continue to be paid substantially less than men doing the same jobs. The Paycheck Fairness Act is essential because current law is just not up to the job of eliminating the discrimination that causes this wage gap…The Supreme Court’s decision in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co., which devastated the use of Title VII for pay discrimination claims, makes the Paycheck Fairness Act all the more necessary. Without the Act, and without a fix to the Ledbetter decision, women will have virtually no ability to effectively challenge pay discrimination.”
– Marcia D. Greenberger, Co-President, National Women’s Law Center, 7/31/2008

Beyond this Bill: 

Earlier this year, the Senate delivered a serious blow to wage equality when it blocked the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act , which the House passed in 2007. The Act would have reversed a Supreme Court decision in Ledbetter V. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. that made bringing compensation discrimination claims against employers unduly difficult. The Paycheck Fairness Act strengthens employees’ claims of discriminatory wage compensation, but the Ledbetter Act is a necessary counterpart to ensure that employees are able to bring such claims into courts when they become aware of discriminatory pay.

It remains critical that the Department of Labor vigorously enforces laws protecting employees against discrimination.

Maine New Hampshire Vermont Massachusetts Rhode Island Connecticut New York New Jersey Pennsylvania Delaware Maryland West Virginia North Carolina South Carolina Georgia Florida Alabama Mississippi Tennessee Virginia Kentucky Ohio Indiana Michigan Illinois Wisconsin Louisiana Arkansas Missouri Iowa Minnesota Oklahoma Kansas Nebraska South Dakota North Dakota Texas Colorado New Mexico Arizona Utah Wyoming Hawaii Alaska Montana Nevada Idaho California Oregon Washington