Bill Statistics

The Middle Class Position

The middle class supports.

How They Voted

87% with middle class
9% against middle class
4% did not vote
Pie Chart

Grades

Grade B
Senate

The Senate receives a grade of B for its support of the middle class on this piece of legislation.

81 Senators voted for the middle-class position; 16 voted against.

Grade A
House

The House receives a grade of A for its support of the middle class on this piece of legislation.

380 Representatives voted for the middle-class position; 34 voted against.

H.R. 5140

Recovery Rebates and Economic Stimulus for the American People Act of 2008

Introduced:
01.28.2008 [House]
Signed into Law: 02.13.2008
Senate: Yea-81, Nay-16
House: Yea-380, Nay-34
The Legislation: 

The Recovery Rebates and Economic Stimulus for the American People Act is based on the economic stimulus package House leaders negotiated with the Bush Administration. The package includes two major components: rapid tax rebates for American households and tax incentives for businesses to invest, as well as provisions increasing the size of home mortgage loans that the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) can insure and that the quasi-governmental enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can purchase. The tax rebates are valued at a maximum of $600 per individual and $1,200 per married couple, with an additional $300 for every child. Everyone with an income greater than $3,000 a year would be eligible -- including senior citizens living on Social Security and disabled veterans receiving disability benefits -- with the rebate amounts phasing out at higher income levels ($75,000 for individuals and $150,000 for couples). In total, the rebates are worth more than $100 billion. The business incentives are worth approximately $50 billion and include bonus depreciation – a temporary tax write off for all companies that purchase new equipment in 2008. In addition, small businesses can double their tax write offs for capital investments and new equipment. The home mortgage provisions temporarily increase the maximum mortgages that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can buy from $417,000 to $729,750. The bill would also allow the FHA to permanently insure mortgages as large as $729,750.

The Middle-Class Position: 

The Middle Class Supports. There is increasing evidence that the economy faces a high risk of recession which could throw millions of middle-class Americans out of work, reduce income and health insurance coverage, and increase poverty. A smart economic stimulus plan could prevent the downturn or soften its effects, but not just any stimulus package will do. To be effective, an economic stimulus package must direct money to those who will spend it quickly, boosting consumer demand and prompting increased production and economic growth. For this reason, the household tax rebates are likely to be effective, if the checks can be sent quickly. It is particularly significant that the rebates are targeted to cash-strapped middle-class and aspiring middle-class Americans, who are more likely than wealthier people to spend the money they receive immediately, rather than saving it. It is also important that Americans relying on Social Security or disability benefits be included, both as an issue of basic fairness and because these groups are likely to spend their rebates quickly.

The increases in FHA, Freddie Mac, and Fannie Mae mortgage limits are also helpful because they help these entities keep up with the current housing market. By buying and insuring loans, the FHA, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae create viable refinance options for middle-class Americans who have been targeted by predatory loan practices and would otherwise be trapped in unaffordable adjustable rate mortgages and other abusive loan products.

The business tax cuts, a product of negotiation between the Bush Administration and Congress, are less positive for the middle class because they provide little simulative effect but would deprive the public of significant revenue and increase deficits. Offering tax incentives for business investment frequently fails to generate substantial economic growth because many businesses use the tax cuts for investments they already planned to undertake anyway, costing the public lost revenue but creating no additional economic activity. Another drawback is that it takes considerable time for businesses to make new investments and for investments to result in increased employment or purchasing. Yet to be most effective economic stimulus should have a rapid impact on the economy. Finally, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities points out that business incentives harm state budgets, since state and federal tax codes are linked. Many states are already facing a revenue crunch due to the economic downturn and, unlike the federal government, they cannot run budget deficits. The result could be cuts in state and local services that middle-class Americans rely on, from education to road maintenance to public safety.

From the Experts: 

“To be useful, a fiscal stimulus package should be implemented quickly and structured so that its effects on aggregate spending are felt as much as possible within the next 12 months or so… Any fiscal package should also be efficient, in the sense of maximizing the amount of near-term stimulus per dollar of increased federal expenditure or lost revenue. Finally, any program should be explicitly temporary… the evidence suggests that measures that involve putting money in the hands of households and firms that will spend it in the near term will be more effective.” –Benjamin Bernanke, Chair, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (January 17, 2008)

“Yesterday’s economic stimulus plan reached by the House Democrats and the Bush administration is a step in the right direction, but simply doesn’t go far enough in making a real difference for America’s working families. As the economy weakens, more jobs will be lost, the cost of necessities will continue to rise, and the people who need the benefits most will be left with no where to turn. Giving tax breaks to business without extending benefits to those most in need only exacerbates the problem.”–Anna Burger, Chair, Change to Win Labor Federation (January 25, 2008)

Beyond this Bill: 

Congress should consider stimulus measures that would provide more direct assistance to the current and aspiring middle-class Americans likely to be hardest hit by an economic downturn while also providing the most cost-effective boost to the economy. Extending and expanding unemployment benefits -- as the Senate did with its original stimulus bill -- should be at the top of the list. Unemployment is already on the rise and it takes longer to find work during an economic downturn when jobs are scarce. People who are out of work tend to spend nearly all of the money they receive in government benefits very quickly, so unemployment benefits provide the quick jolt to consumer spending that the economy needs. What’s more, extending unemployment benefits is one of the most effective stimulus measures yet conceived, providing $1.73 in stimulus for every dollars spent. Congressional leaders and President Bush could also consider several other economic stimulus measures that target aspiring middle-class and middle-class Americans. Home heating credits would ease the burden on current and aspiring middle-class families trying to pay high energy bills, freeing up cash that can be spent on other necessities; food stamp payments could be increased very quickly, aiding very needy Americans who would stimulate the economy immediately by spending the money they no longer need to put towards food; and, federal aid to state governments would offset revenue shortfalls, preventing cuts in state spending on programs like health care and education that benefit the middle class.

Maine New Hampshire Vermont Massachusetts Rhode Island Connecticut New York New Jersey Pennsylvania Delaware Maryland West Virginia North Carolina South Carolina Georgia Florida Alabama Mississippi Tennessee Virginia Kentucky Ohio Indiana Michigan Illinois Wisconsin Louisiana Arkansas Missouri Iowa Minnesota Oklahoma Kansas Nebraska South Dakota North Dakota Texas Colorado New Mexico Arizona Utah Wyoming Hawaii Alaska Montana Nevada Idaho California Oregon Washington