Bill Statistics

The Middle Class Position

The middle class opposes.

How They Voted

30% with middle class
68% against middle class
2% did not vote
Pie Chart

Grades

Grade F
Senate

The Senate receives a grade of F for its support of the middle class on this piece of legislation.

19 Senators voted for the middle-class position; 80 voted against.

Grade F
House

The House receives a grade of F for its support of the middle class on this piece of legislation.

138 Representatives voted for the middle-class position; 283 voted against.

H.R. 6061

Secure Fence Act of 2006

Introduced:
09.13.2006 [House]
Signed into Law: 10.26.2006
Senate: Yea-80, Nay-19
House: Yea-283, Nay-138
The Legislation: 

The Secure Fence Act calls for 700 miles of fencing to be constructed along the US-Mexico border and directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to achieve operational control over the border, ensuring that no unlawful entries are made into the United States, within 18 months. The Act requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide at least 2 layers of reinforced fencing along specific stretches of the border. The legislation also calls for the use of unmanned planes, sensors, satellites, radar and cameras. The Secretary must report to Congress annually on the state of border security. Finally, the Act requests a study on the feasibility of constructing an improved security system along the northern border. The proposed fence would cost an estimated $6 billion.

The Middle-Class Position: 

The Middle Class Opposes. The American middle class relies on the economic contributions of immigrants. Unfortunately, the Secure Fence Act fails to recognize undocumented immigrants’ contributions, ignoring the complexities of economic integration between the United States and Mexico in favor of a wall between the two countries. While border security must ultimately be a part of any comprehensive immigration policy, history suggests that ramped up enforcement in the absence of sufficient opportunities for immigrants to enter the country legally is a waste of resources. Between 1993 and 2005, annual spending on border security tripled, from $480 million to $1.4 billion. Yet the number of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. also nearly tripled during the same period. Would-be migrants simply adopt more remote and dangerous routes of entry into the country, leading to a much higher taxpayer cost per apprehension, or they enter the country legally and overstay their visas. As long as the nation’s immigration laws are fundamentally mismatched with our economic reality, efforts to enforce them are doomed to be costly failures, enacted at the expense of middle-class taxpayers.

From the Experts: 

“[The fence] may work to curtail crossings in the immediate area it has been built, but it won't stop illegal immigration. Experience has shown that traffic will shift to other parts of the border. The draw for illegal immigrants is the availability of employment in the United States, and that is not being addressed by this fence.”
–Doris Meissner, Former Commissioner, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Services (October 2, 2006)

“This is not a sign of strength and engagement, but a sign of weakness and fear. And frankly, speaking as an American, it's an embarrassment."
–Kevin Appleby, director of migration and refugee policy at the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (September 29, 2006)

Beyond this Bill: 

This bill is inimical to middle-class wellbeing and the Senate should not pass it. Instead, legislators in both houses who are concerned about the effects of immigration on their middle-class and aspiring middle-class constituents should work for legislation that bolsters the critical contribution immigrants make to the U.S. economy while also strengthening the rights of immigrants in the workplace so that middle-class wages and working conditions are not driven down.

For a more detailed analysis of the middle-class interest on immigration reform, click here.

Maine New Hampshire Vermont Massachusetts Rhode Island Connecticut New York New Jersey Pennsylvania Delaware Maryland West Virginia North Carolina South Carolina Georgia Florida Alabama Mississippi Tennessee Virginia Kentucky Ohio Indiana Michigan Illinois Wisconsin Louisiana Arkansas Missouri Iowa Minnesota Oklahoma Kansas Nebraska South Dakota North Dakota Texas Colorado New Mexico Arizona Utah Wyoming Hawaii Alaska Montana Nevada Idaho California Oregon Washington