Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2008

atraub — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:13:40 -0500

Legislation

The middle class

Supports

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Estimated total costs from hurricane damage, real estate losses, energy-sector costs, and water costs associated with global warming, if present trends continue, in dollars: 1.9 trillion

Estimated losses in damaged or destroyed residential real estate as a result of rising sea levels, in dollars: 360 billion

Projected percentage growth of U.S. carbon emissions between 2006 and 2030: 16

Number of states that are projected to face water shortages in the next five years: 36

Number of U.S. mayors that signed an agreement to meet or beat Kyoto Protocol targets for emissions reductions, as of June 2005: 141

Number of U.S. mayors that signed an agreement to meet or beat Kyoto Protocol targets for emissions reductions, as of June 2008: 850

Date on which President Bush sent a letter to U.S. Senators voicing his opposition to the Kyoto Protocol: March 13, 2001

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Middle Class Supports. Human-caused climate change brought about in large part by greenhouse gases increasingly threatens Americans’ standard of living. A report recently released by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program, supported by the findings of the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, warned of more heat-related deaths, increased risk of Lyme disease and West Nile virus, more extreme weather, and disruptions in population growth at the local level due to climate change. An American economy built on greenhouse gas emitting fossil fuels is unsustainable. By setting meaningful, yet achievable, goals for emissions reduction, the Climate Security Act is an important step to reorient the American economy towards sustainable growth. Though change will likely bring increased energy prices, the legislation appropriately directs funds to programs that will mitigate the pain felt by consumers and individuals working in affected industries. In particular, the creation of the Climate Change Worker Training and Assistance Fund is a forward-looking measure that will help American workers adapt to jobs that not only support energy efficiency, but pay decent wages as well. Funds to encourage energy efficient technology and mass transit projects are a further demonstration of a commitment to a sustainable and efficient economy.

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

Global Warming Basics from the Pew Center on Global Climate Change

Policy Solutions from the National Resources Defense Council

Climate Assessments from the U.S. Government’s Global Change Research Program

Energy Policy Act of 2005

atraub — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:09:21 -0400

Legislation

The middle class

Opposes

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Total cost of tax breaks and subsidies in this bill: $85.1 billion
Earnings of oil giant ExxonMobil in the first quarter of 2005: $7.86 billion
Value of subsidies to oil and gas companies like ExxonMobil contained in this bill: $6 billion
Approximate proportion of Americans who considered high gas prices “a hardship” in April 2005, according to Gallup: 6 in 10
Retail cost of one gallon of gasoline on August 8, 2005, the day President Bush signed this bill: $2.60
Estimated amount middle-class households spent on gasoline in 2005, not including taxes: $1,778

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

The Middle Class Opposes. The most startling thing about this legislation is what it does not do. In the first place, the 1,700-page multi-billion dollar bill fails to help middle-class consumers squeezed by high gas and fuel costs. The rollback in public safety protections also puts middle-class families at risk, for example by exempting oil and gas companies from the provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act when these companies inject carcinogenic chemicals into the ground. At the same time, the deregulation of public utilities exposes the middle class to a different kind of risk: stemming from increased consolidation of utilities that could raise electric rates and manipulate energy markets. What the bill does do is provide massive taxpayer subsidies – to the tune of $85.1 billion dollars – for some of the world’s most profitable corporations, so that, among other things, they can drill on public land while paying the public less, ultimately leaving middle-class families to pick up a bigger share of the cost of public services. Finally, although the legislation comes at a time of overwhelming scientific evidence about the dangers of global warming and increased concern about the nation’s dependence on foreign oil, it does very little to address either problem, neglecting to even increase fuel efficiency standards for cars.

Natural gas

Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2008

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Related Blog: Header

Quotes from Experts

Related Blog: Text

Beyond this Bill

Related Blog: Link

Additional Resources

Energy Policy Act of 2005

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Related Blog: Header

Quotes from Experts

Related Blog: Text

Beyond this Bill

Related Blog: Link

Additional Resources