Consumers

Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008

hmoroz — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:44:58 -0400

Legislation

The middle class

Opposes

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Amount authorized for the Treasury Secretary to use to buy troubled assets: $700 billion

GDP (PPP) of Taiwan in 2007: $695.4 billion

Percentage increase in foreclosure filings from August of 2007 to August of 2008: 27

Likelihood that a U.S. household received a foreclosure filing during August of 2008: 1/416

Number of foreclosures expected to occur in late 2008 and throughout 2009: 2,164,000

Estimated number of foreclosures that the mortgage restructuring provision for primary residences, not included in this legislation, would prevent: 600,000

Decrease in home values caused by nearby subprime foreclosures in late 2008 and throughout 2009: $352 billion

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Middle Class Opposes. Middle-class Americans, no matter how far removed from Wall Street, will be adversely affected by the crisis in finance and credit that now grips our economy. After a prolonged period of stagnant wages and economic growth that benefited primarily the wealthiest, middle-class Americans rely heavily on credit to purchase everyday necessities, pay medical bills, and fund college educations. Epic stock market declines have eaten away at the retirement savings of senior citizens who have no other source of income. If the government does not act to make more credit available, credit for the loans that finance payrolls and state and local government operations will dry up, increasing unemployment. Government action is absolutely necessary to ensure that middle-class Americans’ standard of living does not suffer gravely from the credit crisis.

Yet, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 is not the action middle-class Americans need. Instead of a top-down bailout, credit markets should be stabilized from the bottom up. To the extent that a direct investment in the financial services industry is made, it should fully complement large-scale mortgage restructuring and foreclosure prevention efforts and the re-regulation of the financial services industry. This would not only benefit struggling homeowners, but is widely understood to be part of an effective strategy to aid financial markets through stabilized payment streams.

The nation’s first priority should be to repair the damage done to the housing market and to the lives of working- and middle-class Americans.

Any proposed remedy for the financial crisis must begin with assistance for struggling homeowners. This should come in the form of a longer-term, government-led commitment to reshape the mortgage landscape of this country. One promising model is the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC). Originally established during the New Deal, HOLC made more than 1 million loans to refinance mortgages in distress, which constituted a fifth of all mortgage loans. At present, this would represent about 10 million loans, with the total value of mortgages held by HOLC in 1937 approximately equivalent to the total of all subprime mortgage loans. HOLC helped about 80% of homeowners who refinanced stay in their homes.
Bankruptcy protection for primary residences is critical. This measure would allow bankruptcy judges to rewrite mortgages on first homes (as is now possible for second homes and yachts) on terms struggling homeowners could afford. The change could prevent as many as 600,000 foreclosures.
A moratorium on foreclosures would provide an immediate opportunity for homeowners to work out loan modifications with lenders.

The financial crisis is serious and will affect the lives of middle-class Americans immediately and significantly. At the same time, only financial rescue legislation that includes significant assistance for homeowners can initiate a full, long-term recovery from the current crisis.

Despite the inclusion of several special-interest tax breaks in the Act, the tax changes added to the legislation are generally very important to the middle-class. The energy tax credit expansions and extensions are part of a long-term strategy to alleviate high gas and heating costs, make the country more energy efficient, and ensure that the economy retains jobs in renewable energy and technology. Changes to the child tax credit would make 2.9 million additional children eligible for the benefit and would increase the benefit for 10.1 million more. Temporarily raising the Alternative Minimum Tax exemption ensures that middle-class Americans are not overwhelmed by a tax that they were never intended to pay.

Finally, the mental health and “substance use disorder” parity provisions of the Act not only do much to remedy the discriminatory practices of insurers, but will increase access to mental health care services for middle-class Americans already struggling with high health care costs.

While these last-minute additions to the bailout package are positive for the middle class and should become law, they are not relevant to this bill and should be enacted separately. Ultimately, these provisions do not outweigh the substantial shortcomings of the financial bailout.

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

Harvard Law Professor Elizabeth Warren on Bankruptcy Reform and the Housing Crisis

Center for Responsible Lending on Court-Supervised Loan Modifications

A History of the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation from the Center for American Progress

Renewable Energy and Job Creation Act of 2008

hmoroz — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:22:48 -0400

Legislation

The middle class

Supports

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Percentage of the benefits of the child tax credit that went to families in the top 40% of the income distribution in 2005: 60

Maximum percentage of the benefits of the child tax credit that went to families in the lowest 20% of the income distribution in 2005: 1

Estimated number of children that the child tax credit provision in the legislation would benefit: 13 million

Estimated number of jobs that could be lost if federal tax credits for solar and wind energy are not extended: 116,000

Percentage by which the cost-sharing for addiction benefits exceeded that for medical or surgical benefits, according to a 2007 Health Affairs study of employer-provided benefits: 46

Number of taxpayers subject to the alternative minimum tax in 1970: 20,000

Number of taxpayers projected to be subject to the alternative minimum tax in 2010, absent changes in current law: 33 million

Number of taxpayers subject to the alternative minimum tax in 2007, after Congress passed a temporary alternative minimum tax patch: 4.1 million

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

The Middle Class Supports. The Renewable Energy and Job Creation Act includes a wide range of tax cuts and legislative initiatives, but the overall thrust of the bill is highly positive for the middle-class. Indeed, middle-class Americans are increasingly feeling the effects of an energy policy that favors large oil companies over the economic and environmental benefits of sustainability. The energy tax credit expansions and extensions in the Renewable Energy and Job Creation Act are part of a long-term strategy to alleviate high gas and heating costs, make the country more energy efficient, and ensure that the economy retains jobs in renewable energy and technology. With the middle class already feeling the effects of weak employment, Congress must strengthen a renewable energy and energy efficiency industry that benefits both the environment and the economy.

Additionally, the Renewable Energy and Job Creation Act’s changes to the child tax credit would make 2.9 million additional children eligible for the benefit and would increase the benefit for 10.1 million more. Expanding the income floor for the tax credit means that very low-income aspiring middle-class families, who currently benefit less from the credit than higher-income families, will receive the support they need to make ends meet.

The mental health and “substance use disorder” parity provisions of the Act not only do much to remedy the discriminatory practices of insurers, but will increase access to mental health care services for middle-class Americans already struggling with high health care costs. Temporarily raising the Alternative Minimum Tax exemption ensures that middle-class Americans are not overwhelmed by a tax that they were never intended to pay. An increase in tax payments for more than 25 million American homes – exposing fully 46% of households with incomes between $75,000 and $100,000 to the AMT by 2010– would be disastrous for families already reeling from home foreclosures, high gas prices, and nearly stagnant wages.

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

“Greener Pathways: Jobs and Workforce Development in the Clean Energy Economy,” from the Apollo Alliance

“Taxation and the Family: What is the child tax credit?” from the Tax Policy Center

Tax Topics: Individual Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), from the Tax Policy Center

Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights Act of 2008

hmoroz — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:11:17 -0400

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Total revolving debt – mostly made up by credit cards – in 2003: $560 billion

Total revolving debt in June of 2008: $966 billion

Number of mailed credit card offerings in 1990: 1.1 billion

Number of mailed credit card offerings in 2005: 6.06 billion

Amount of fees charged to credit card customers in 2002: $10.7 billion

Amount of fees charged to credit card customers in 2007: $33 billion

Percentage increase in late fees from 1995 to 2005, adjusted for inflation, according to the Government Accountability Office: 115%

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Many middle-class Americans rely on credit cards to meet daily expenses. Revolving debt – which mostly stems from credit cards – has increased 25% since 2003. 80% of U.S. households have at least one credit card and 55% of households carried an outstanding balance in 2006 . At the same time, middle-class households are constantly bombarded with misleading credit card offers even when they cannot afford to take on additional debt. But since credit is increasingly necessary to fund a middle-class standard of living, credit card companies have been able to take advantage of their customers. Consumers have been slapped with excessive and obscure fees and interest charges that, if they are explained at all, are described in small text and confusing language. It is now common practice for credit card companies to apply finance charges twice in a billing cycle (double-cycle billing); to charge multiple over-the-limit fees; and to apply payments on balances with multiple interest rates to the balance with the lowest rate, all practices banned or restricted under this bill.The Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Right ends the most insidious practices employed by credit card companies, protecting consumers from practices that can keep them mired in credit card debt despite their best efforts to dig themselves out.

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

“Reining In Credit Card Abuses,” from U.S. PIRG

2008 Credit Card Survey, from Consumer Action

“The Arbitration Trap: How Credit Card Companies Ensnare Consumers,” from Public Citizen

Comprehensive American Energy Security and Consumer Protection Act of 2008

hmoroz — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:12:59 -0400

Legislation

The middle class

Supports

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Percentage increase in annual crude oil production in 2030 if restrictions on access to drilling in the Outer Continental Shelf are lifted, according to the Energy Information Administration: 7

Projected impact of this increased production on the price of oil: “insignificant”

Percent of world’s known reserves in the United States: 1.58%

Percentage of carbon emissions in the United States from residential and commercial buildings: 39

Number of new jobs that the American Solar Energy Society found were generated by U.S. renewable energy and energy efficiency industries in 2006: 8.5 million

Estimated number of jobs created in 2030 in U.S. renewable energy and energy efficiency industries, assuming no policy changes before 2030: 16 million

Estimated number of jobs created in 2030 in U.S. renewable energy and energy efficiency industries, assuming moderate, incremental federal and state renewable and energy efficiency initiatives and favorable market conditions: 21 million

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Middle Class Supports. Though the extremely high gas prices experienced this summer have eased, middle-class Americans remain strapped by a combination of difficult economic conditions that include elevated fuel costs, a tanking housing market, an endangered financial system, and widespread unemployment. The renewable energy and energy efficiency provisions adopted by the legislation – from credits for energy-efficient home appliances to green building standards and energy-conscious low-income housing – demonstrate a commitment to transforming the environment and the economy that can reduce energy costs and provide jobs for middle-class Americans struggling to make ends meet. Such measures are impotant steps in making the country more energy efficient and ensuring that the nation retains and produces more jobs in renewable energy and technology. Finally, the renewable electricity standard establishes an important incentive for electricity providers to switch to renewable energy sources, a commitment these providers have not made on their own.

The revenue-raising measures appropriately target the oil companies who have benefited grandly from high oil prices. Additionally, ethics reform is desperately needed in the Mineral Management Service after disturbing reports of oil industry influence buying in the agency.

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

Clean Energy 101, from the Union of Concerned Scientists

Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency: Economic Drivers for the 21st Century, from the Appollo Alliance

Impacts of Increased Access to Oil and Natural Gas, from the Energy Information Administration

Fairness in Nursing Home Arbitration Act of 2008

hmoroz — Mon, 08 Sep 2008 17:39:14 -0400

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008

hmoroz — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:56:11 -0400

Legislation

The middle class

Supports

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Percentage of dependent Pell Grant recipients whose family income is less than $20,000: 40

Percentage of tuition and fees (including room and board) at public four-year colleges that was covered by the maximum Pell Grant in the 1986-1987 school year: 52

Percentage of tuition and fees (including room and board) at public four-year colleges that was covered by the maximum Pell Grant in the 2006-2007 school year: 32

Amount that the average college student pays for textbooks each year: $900

Average number of hours that the Brookings Institution estimates an applicant needs to complete the FAFSA: 10

Number of hours a year spent filling out financial aid forms: 100 million

Equivalent in full-time jobs: 55,000

Number of students who have not received financial aid due to drug convictions since the provision went into effect in 2000: 200,000

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Middle Class Supports. Although a college education is increasingly a prerequisite for a middle-class standard of living, current and aspiring middle-class students and their families are struggling more than ever to afford college. Indeed, in recent years the maximum Pell Grant, designed to provide financially strapped students with an opportunity to attend college, has failed to keep pace with rising higher education costs. 2007’s College Cost Reduction and Access Act, which increased the maximum Pell Grant and limited federal subsidies to student lenders in order to increase college financial aid by $20 billion, was a necessary first step in making college more affordable. The Higher Education Opportunity Act’s additional increase of the maximum Pell grant will make college accessible to more aspiring middle-class Americans. Additionally, the expansion of the Pell Grant program to include year-round education supports the hardest-working students struggling to complete their educations quickly. Continued commitment to the TRIO and GEAR UP programs is critical to ensuring that first generation and at-risk students are able to obtain a college education and achieve a middle-class standard of living.

Skyrocketing tuition costs and large and confusing debt obligations can make college unaffordable and financial stability after college difficult. Indeed, the College Board reports that average tuition and fees at four-year public institutions have increased 51% over the last five years and that private undergraduate loans have grown from 3% to 12% of the funds used to finance postsecondary education since the 1996-1997 school year . The Higher Education Opportunity Act improves a student loan system that has been characterized by favoritism and murky lending practices. The Act will help put an end to the most egregious conflicts of interest and will expand and simplify the information that is available to students and their families when deciding what colleges to attend and what loans to take out. Ending such conflicts of interest will ensure that students receive the most affordable loans, not loans that are the favorites of an unethical financial aid officer. A simplified application form for federal student aid will ensure that students are not dissuaded from seeking financial assistance for higher education because of complex paperwork. Stricter reporting requirements for institutions that that fail to rein in tuition hikes are a positive step in influencing institutions of higher education to make college more affordable. Efforts to reduce the cost of textbooks will also be helpful to students struggling with high costs.

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

Higher Education Project, from U.S. Public Interest Research Group

Window of Opportunity: Targeting Federal Grant Aid to Students with the Lowest Incomes, from the Institute for Higher Education Policy

Trends in College Pricing 2007, from the College Board

Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008

hmoroz — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:26:30 -0400

Legislation

The middle class

Supports

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Total units of recalled children’s products in 2007: 46,562,901

Percentage of these recalls that were for children’s products: 52

Percent increase in recalls through the end of June 2008 over fiscal year 2007: 22

Approximate number of children, ages 14 and under, who are treated at hospital emergency rooms for toy-related injuries in a given year: 121,500

Operating budget of the Consumer Product Safety Commission in 1974, the year the agency was created, expressed in today’s dolalrs: $125 million

Consumer Product Safety Commission operating budget in 2007: $62,370,000

Number of full-time employees at the CPSC in 1974, the year the commission was established: 786

Number of full-time employees at the CPSC in 2007: 420

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

The Middle Class Supports. The record-setting 448 product recalls last year made 2007 the year of the recall. Although the Consumer Product Safety Commission is responsible for protecting consumers from more than 15,000 types of consumer products, an anemic budget and staff shortages have increasingly put middle-class American consumers at risk. The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, a compromise version of bills passed by the House and Senate bills earlier in the year, responds vigorously to the dangers that middle-class consumers increasingly confront at the supermarket, at the toy store, and in their own homes. By providing the CPSC with additional funding through 2014, along with a mandate to increase its fulltime staff and a rule making committee meetings and rulemaking easier, the legislation helps to ensure that competent inspectors remain vigilant of consumer safety. Empowering state attorneys general to file suit when they believe that residents of a state have been adversely affected by a violation of a consumer product safety rule creates an additional layer of consumer protection. Independent third-party testing of children’s products prevents the insidious practice by which manufacturers would certify the safety of their own goods, while mandatory toy safety standards are a commonsense response to the recent explosion of toy recalls. A database of consumer complaints about dangerous products will both educate the public about potentially harmful goods and allow consumers to voice their concerns about such products. The ban on lead and phthalates in children’s products and the increase in the age level at which a product is considered to be intended for a child will benefit parents who would otherwise be unable to determine if a toy is safe. Whistleblower protections will ensure that vigilant industry employees do not fear job or compensation loss for reporting negligent manufacturing practices or poor oversight.

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

Recalls and Product Safety News from the Consumer Product Safety Commission

“2007: The Year of the Recall”, from Kids in Danger

“Total Recall: The Need for CPSC Reform Now”

Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008

hmoroz — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:21:47 -0400

Legislation

The middle class

Supports

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Percent increase of foreclosure filings from June 2007 to June 2008: 53

Approximate value of mortgages that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac own or guarantee: $5.2 trillion

Total residential mortgage debt outstanding in the first quarter of 2008: $12.1 trillion

Total outstanding public debt: $9.5 trillion

Percentage of new mortgages Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac currently originate or guarantee, according to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson: 70

Number of homes that will experience devaluation because of subprime foreclosures that take place nearby: 40.6 million

Average decline in property values for homeowners living near foreclosed properties, in dollars: 5,000

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Middle Class Supports. As many as 2.5 million families could lose their homes to foreclosure in 2008. At the same time, growing doubts about the solvency of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac threaten to further destabilize the entire U.S. economy. Congress is not acting a moment too soon..

The refinancing program created by the American Housing Rescue and Foreclosure Prevention Act will have concrete results for middle-class homeowners facing the frightening prospect of foreclosure. Although participation in the program is voluntary for lenders, many are expected to participate and the measure is projected to help approximately 400,000 homeowners. Because the bill forces lenders to write down the principal by at least 10%, the program offers a less generous bailout to mortgage lenders than it otherwise might. Since irresponsible lending is a major cause of the current financial and home equity crisis, the effort to restrict the tax-payer funded bonanza for these lenders is beneficial.

The $4 billion of CDBG funds authorized by the legislation addresses two important problems plaguing aspiring middle-class Americans: the community breakdown that can result from vacant foreclosed homes in neighborhoods across the country and the lack of affordable housing in many communities. Middle-class Americans who are current on their mortgages and face no personal risk of foreclosure are nevertheless harmed when a foreclosed home down the street brings down property values, erodes the local tax base, and threatens to become a magnet for crime. The Center for Responsible Lending has shown that approximately 40.6 million homes will experience devaluation because of nearby subprime foreclosures, that homeowners living near foreclosed properties will lose approximately $5,000 on the value of their homes, and that approximately $200 billion dollars in house values and tax base will be lost from nearby foreclosures. By funneling federal money to local agencies to serve lower- and extremely low-income individuals, the CDBG funds will help neighborhoods recover from the harm done to their communities by foreclosures while helping to ensure that neighborhoods can accommodate aspiring middle-class Americans.

While the Congressional Budget Office believes that there is a 50% or better chance that Treasury will not have to use its new authority to purchase stock in the GSEs, the enactment of this authority reassures markets that the federal government is willing to serve as a backstop if Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac continue to falter. Because these secondary mortgage lenders hold or guarantee approximately half of all mortgages, their failure would have devastating consequences for middle-class families and the American economy as a whole. The promise of a bailout is regrettably necessary to prevent further market destabilization.

Increased oversight of the GSEs will be crucial to ensuring that the government-backed entities minimize taxpayer risk, while making mortgages affordable to middle-class Americans. Standards for a mortgage licensing and registration system and enhanced mortgage disclosure requirements are forward-looking measures that will help prevent the predatory lending and other improper lending practices that contributed to the foreclosure crisis.

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

Mortgage Lending, from the Center for Responsible Lending

Housing Policy, from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

A Brief History of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, from Time

Saving Energy Through Public Transportation Act of 2008

hmoroz — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:12:43 -0400

Legislation

The middle class

Supports

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Net oil savings from the use of public transportation in 2006, according to USPIRG: 3.4 billion gallons

Dollar amount of this savings at today’s gas prices: 13.6 billion

Amount spent by households in neighborhoods with the best access to transit routes on all transportation costs, including gas, insurance, upkeep, and transit fares: $728

Amount spent by households in neighborhoods with the least access to transit: $925

Increase in public transportation use since 1995: 32%

Price of a gallon of gasoline on June 25, 2008, the date on which President Bush issued a veto threat for the Saving Energy Through Public Transportation Act: $4.07

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

The Middle Class Supports. With gas prices hovering at $4.00 a gallon, middle-class Americans are feeling the squeeze. While there are no quick fixes, public transportation is becoming an increasingly appealing option for more middle-class Americans. A recent report shows that households with the best access to public transportation routes spends an average of $728 a month on transportation costs, while households with the worst access spend almost $200 more. The American Public Transportation Association (APTA) has found that high gas prices, congestion, and expanded public transit services have led to a 32% increase in public transportation use since 1995 and that the average annual household savings from using public transportation is $6,251. Public transportation is also an effective means to support environmental sustainability. Net oil savings from public transportation were estimated to be 3.4 billion gallons in 2006 and public transportation reduces carbon dioxide emissions by 37 million metric tons each year.

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

Transportation Resources, from Smart Growth Online

"A Bridge to Somewhere: Rethinking American Transportation for the 21st Century," from the Brookings Institution

"Squandering the Stimulus: An Analysis of Household Gas Spending, Economic Stimulus Checks, and the Need for Better Transportation Options," from USPIRG

Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008 [Revised Bill]

atraub — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:37:17 -0400

Legislation

The middle class

Supports

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Amount of mortgage-related assets that the Federal Reserve assumed as collateral for a loan it made to facilitate the sale of Bear Sterns to J.P. Morgan Chase: $30 billion

Amount this bill provides in tax refunds for businesses that claim a loss: $6.1 billion

Amount this bill provides to state and local governments across the country to shore up neighborhoods devastated by mortgage foreclosures: $4 billion

Estimated number of foreclosures prevented if Congress lifted the ban on loan modifications by bankruptcy courts, a provision this bill does not include: 600,000

Amount of home equity saved if Congress lifted the ban on court-supervised loan modifications that would otherwise be lost because of foreclosures of neighboring properties: $72.5 billion

Amount that lifting the ban on court-supervised loan modifications would cost middle-class taxpayers: $0

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

The Middle Class Supports. With two million families facing the loss of their homes over the next two years and large sectors of the U.S. economy destabilized by mortgage defaults, the foreclosure crisis and the wider turmoil it has caused are among the greatest threats to middle-class Americans today. This bill responds to that threat, although not in the most effective way. The bill is stuffed with costly and irrelevant provisions, while the positive steps it does include fail to go far enough to help struggling families. The single most effective measure proposed to address the crisis – a change in bankruptcy law that would prevent hundreds of thousands of foreclosures – was killed as an amendment. Meanwhile some provisions that did make it into the final bill could even make the foreclosure problem worse.

Positive measures in the bill include FHA modernization, which will enable more homeowners to refinance problematic mortgages. The block grants for communities hard hit by the crisis to reclaim foreclosed properties and turn them into affordable homes is another very positive step, but here too the amount of funding may be too little to revitalize neighborhoods in need. Funding for mortgage counseling is also beneficial, but inadequate. And while enhanced mortgage disclosures are helpful, they are no substitute for a genuine ban on deceptive lending practices along the lines enacted by some state governments. The tax exempt bonds for state agencies to refinance subprime loans is a modest effort which will inevitably bail out lenders, whose lax standards helped cause the crisis, along with struggling homeowners.

While provisions to help homeowners and devastated communities are stingy, home builders and other businesses facing economic losses due to the downturn reap $6.1 billion in tax breaks. This provision has little to do with helping prevent foreclosure and is not even a cost-effective means of economic stimulus. The property tax deduction for non-itemizers is similarly problematic. While many middle-class families might see a small tax break under this provision, the credit is not substantial enough to help families who face foreclosure or are having serious difficulties making mortgage payments and is not targeted at these homeowners. To make matters worse, the deduction is limited to people who live in areas that have not raised property taxes. This creates an incentive for states and municipalities to cut services that middle-class families rely on rather than raising the revenue needed to preserve them. Finally, the tax credit for buying a foreclosed home might, as the Washington Post point out, actually encourage more home foreclosures.

The alternative energy tax breaks, added at the last minute, are similar to those included in the House’s Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act. Providing the public investment necessary to jump start the development and promotion of renewable energy sources and ultimately mitigate global warming sweetens what is otherwise a unsatisfactory effort to deal with the home mortgage crisis. Middle-class Americans will ultimately see some benefit from this bill – but they deserve better.

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

“Senate Housing Legislation Highly Disappointing” from the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities

Mortgage Lending page from the Center for Responsible Lending

Consumers

Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Related Blog: Header

Quotes from Experts

Related Blog: Text

Beyond this Bill

Related Blog: Link

Additional Resources

Renewable Energy and Job Creation Act of 2008

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Related Blog: Header

Quotes from Experts

Related Blog: Text

Beyond this Bill

Related Blog: Link

Additional Resources

Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights Act of 2008

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Related Blog: Header

Quotes from Experts

Related Blog: Text

Beyond this Bill

Related Blog: Link

Additional Resources

Comprehensive American Energy Security and Consumer Protection Act of 2008

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Related Blog: Header

Quotes from Experts

Related Blog: Text

Beyond this Bill

Related Blog: Link

Additional Resources

Fairness in Nursing Home Arbitration Act of 2008

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Related Blog: Header

Quotes from Experts

Related Blog: Text

Beyond this Bill

Related Blog: Link

Additional Resources

Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Related Blog: Header

Quotes from Experts

Related Blog: Text

Beyond this Bill

Related Blog: Link

Additional Resources

Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008