Tax cuts

Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008 [Revised Bill]

atraub — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:37:17 -0400

Legislation

The middle class

Supports

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Amount of mortgage-related assets that the Federal Reserve assumed as collateral for a loan it made to facilitate the sale of Bear Sterns to J.P. Morgan Chase: $30 billion

Amount this bill provides in tax refunds for businesses that claim a loss: $6.1 billion

Amount this bill provides to state and local governments across the country to shore up neighborhoods devastated by mortgage foreclosures: $4 billion

Estimated number of foreclosures prevented if Congress lifted the ban on loan modifications by bankruptcy courts, a provision this bill does not include: 600,000

Amount of home equity saved if Congress lifted the ban on court-supervised loan modifications that would otherwise be lost because of foreclosures of neighboring properties: $72.5 billion

Amount that lifting the ban on court-supervised loan modifications would cost middle-class taxpayers: $0

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

The Middle Class Supports. With two million families facing the loss of their homes over the next two years and large sectors of the U.S. economy destabilized by mortgage defaults, the foreclosure crisis and the wider turmoil it has caused are among the greatest threats to middle-class Americans today. This bill responds to that threat, although not in the most effective way. The bill is stuffed with costly and irrelevant provisions, while the positive steps it does include fail to go far enough to help struggling families. The single most effective measure proposed to address the crisis – a change in bankruptcy law that would prevent hundreds of thousands of foreclosures – was killed as an amendment. Meanwhile some provisions that did make it into the final bill could even make the foreclosure problem worse.

Positive measures in the bill include FHA modernization, which will enable more homeowners to refinance problematic mortgages. The block grants for communities hard hit by the crisis to reclaim foreclosed properties and turn them into affordable homes is another very positive step, but here too the amount of funding may be too little to revitalize neighborhoods in need. Funding for mortgage counseling is also beneficial, but inadequate. And while enhanced mortgage disclosures are helpful, they are no substitute for a genuine ban on deceptive lending practices along the lines enacted by some state governments. The tax exempt bonds for state agencies to refinance subprime loans is a modest effort which will inevitably bail out lenders, whose lax standards helped cause the crisis, along with struggling homeowners.

While provisions to help homeowners and devastated communities are stingy, home builders and other businesses facing economic losses due to the downturn reap $6.1 billion in tax breaks. This provision has little to do with helping prevent foreclosure and is not even a cost-effective means of economic stimulus. The property tax deduction for non-itemizers is similarly problematic. While many middle-class families might see a small tax break under this provision, the credit is not substantial enough to help families who face foreclosure or are having serious difficulties making mortgage payments and is not targeted at these homeowners. To make matters worse, the deduction is limited to people who live in areas that have not raised property taxes. This creates an incentive for states and municipalities to cut services that middle-class families rely on rather than raising the revenue needed to preserve them. Finally, the tax credit for buying a foreclosed home might, as the Washington Post point out, actually encourage more home foreclosures.

The alternative energy tax breaks, added at the last minute, are similar to those included in the House’s Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act. Providing the public investment necessary to jump start the development and promotion of renewable energy sources and ultimately mitigate global warming sweetens what is otherwise a unsatisfactory effort to deal with the home mortgage crisis. Middle-class Americans will ultimately see some benefit from this bill – but they deserve better.

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

“Senate Housing Legislation Highly Disappointing” from the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities

Mortgage Lending page from the Center for Responsible Lending

Recovery Rebates and Economic Stimulus for the American People Act of 2008

atraub — Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:06:08 -0500

Legislation

The middle class

Supports

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Amount of stimulus produced for every $1 in tax cuts targeted to low-income households: $1.19

Amount of stimulus produced for every $1 in tax cuts provided through a business investment write off policy: $0.24

Amount of stimulus produced for every $1 spent on extending emergency federal unemployment insurance benefits: $1.73

Amount of stimulus produced for every $1 spent on state government aid: $1.24

Minimum amount of revenue states are projected to lose as a result of the investment incentives, according to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities: $4 billion

Percentage of businesses in a 2006 survey that said that bonus depreciation, a type of investment incentive implemented in the past, was an important factor in their decisions about investment level or timing: 10

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

The Middle Class Supports. There is increasing evidence that the economy faces a high risk of recession which could throw millions of middle-class Americans out of work, reduce income and health insurance coverage, and increase poverty. A smart economic stimulus plan could prevent the downturn or soften its effects, but not just any stimulus package will do. To be effective, an economic stimulus package must direct money to those who will spend it quickly, boosting consumer demand and prompting increased production and economic growth. For this reason, the household tax rebates are likely to be effective, if the checks can be sent quickly. It is particularly significant that the rebates are targeted to cash-strapped middle-class and aspiring middle-class Americans, who are more likely than wealthier people to spend the money they receive immediately, rather than saving it. It is also important that Americans relying on Social Security or disability benefits be included, both as an issue of basic fairness and because these groups are likely to spend their rebates quickly.

The increases in FHA, Freddie Mac, and Fannie Mae mortgage limits are also helpful because they help these entities keep up with the current housing market. By buying and insuring loans, the FHA, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae create viable refinance options for middle-class Americans who have been targeted by predatory loan practices and would otherwise be trapped in unaffordable adjustable rate mortgages and other abusive loan products.

The business tax cuts, a product of negotiation between the Bush Administration and Congress, are less positive for the middle class because they provide little simulative effect but would deprive the public of significant revenue and increase deficits. Offering tax incentives for business investment frequently fails to generate substantial economic growth because many businesses use the tax cuts for investments they already planned to undertake anyway, costing the public lost revenue but creating no additional economic activity. Another drawback is that it takes considerable time for businesses to make new investments and for investments to result in increased employment or purchasing. Yet to be most effective economic stimulus should have a rapid impact on the economy. Finally, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities points out that business incentives harm state budgets, since state and federal tax codes are linked. Many states are already facing a revenue crunch due to the economic downturn and, unlike the federal government, they cannot run budget deficits. The result could be cuts in state and local services that middle-class Americans rely on, from education to road maintenance to public safety.

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

“Strategy for Economic Rebound: Smart Stimulus to Counteract and Economic Slowdown,” from the Economic Policy Institute

“Options for Responding to Short-Term Economic Weakness,” from the Congressional Budget Office

“Assessing President Bush’s Fiscal Policies,” from Economy.com

Tax Reduction and Reform Act of 2007

atraub — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 10:57:09 -0500

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

Temporary Tax Relief Act of 2007

hmoroz — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:47:23 -0500

Legislation

The middle class

Supports

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Number of taxpayers affected by the AMT in 2006, with the exemption that is extended in this legislation: 3.5 million

Number of taxpayers who will be affected by the AMT in 2007 if this legislation is not enacted into law: 23.4 million

Average compensation paid to the 25 individual hedge-fund managers with the highest earnings in 2006: $570,000,000

Approximate loss of revenue to the U.S. Treasury in 2006 alone from taxing the carried interest of these 25 fund managers as capital gains: $1,995,000,000

Amount that the IRS estimates it will spend in startup and ongoing maintenance costs through FY2007 for the private collection agency program: $71 million

Revenue the IRS estimates it would generate if it applied this $71 million to its own IRS Automated Collection System: $1.4 billion

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

The Middle Class Supports. The Temporary Tax Relief Act of 2007 ensures that middle-class Americans are not overwhelmed by a tax that they were never intended to pay. An increase of approximately $3,000 in tax payments for more than 20 million American homes would be disastrous for families already reeling from home foreclosures, high gas prices, and nearly stagnant wages. The bill’s tax credit increases and extensions, including credits for college tuition and for improving public schools in economically distressed areas, benefit current and aspiring middle-class families. The legislation also spares families who have lost their homes to foreclosure from large income tax bills that would result from their mortgage debts being voided. This provision provides relief for households engulfed by the housing crisis that would otherwise be subject to large tax bills even after losing their homes. The bill’s revenue-raising tax hikes target the appropriate group: extraordinarily wealthy hedge fund and private equity managers who have exploited loopholes in the tax code to avoid paying their fair share of taxes.

Finally, the Tax Relief Act’s prohibition of debt-collection contracts between the IRS and private companies, a ban suggested by the IRS’s taxpayer advocate, will put a stop to the harassment of lower- and middle-income taxpayers that resulted from the unaccountable, inefficient, and expensive outsourcing of a public function to the private sector.

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

House AMT “Patch” Bill Is Fiscally Responsible from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Tax Topics: Individual Alternative Minimum Tax from the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center

The Taxation of Carried Interest, Testimony before the Finance Committee of the U.S. Senate

Nina Olson, National Taxpayer Advocate, Statement on the IRS’s private debt collection inititative

Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007

atraub — Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:37:08 -0500

Legislation

The middle class

Supports

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Amount this legislation would save U.S. consumers in 2020, according to the Union of Concerned Scientists: $22 billion

Barrels of oil per day that would be saved in 2020 due to this bill: 1.1 million

Metric tons of global warming pollution that would be prevented by 2020 due to this bill: 190 million

Number of states, including the District of Columbia, that have already adopted renewable electricity standards: 26

Corporate profits made by oil company Exxon Mobile in the first three quarters of 2007: $28.95 billion

Average cost of a gallon of gasoline the week this legislation passed the House: $3.11

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

The Middle Class Supports. This legislation represents a major step toward redirecting U.S. energy usage in a cleaner, more sustainable direction. The bill will save American consumers money at the fuel pump and on their heating bills, reduce air and water pollution, and mitigate the threat of global warming. Like its earlier incarnation, the CLEAN Energy Act of 2007 this bill recognizes that fossil fuels are not a sustainable option for the nation’s growing energy needs, and that a substantial public investment is needed to jump start the development and promotion of renewable energy sources and energy-efficient technologies. In the short term, this investment would create jobs producing renewable energy and technology. In the long term, new energy sources and more efficient technology promise environmental and public health benefits, as well as lower costs, for the American middle class. The bill also funds the investments in an appropriate way: by repealing taxpayer subsidies to the oil industry, which is already making booming profits at the expense of middle-class consumers.

This legislation also goes beyond what the original CLEAN Energy Act attempted, by establishing a Renewable Electricity Standard and stricter fuel economy standards for cars. These improvements marshal even more of the nation’s resources in support of conservation and a shift toward renewable energy, building on advances already adopted in many states to create a more sustainable energy future for the nation.

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

Union of Concerned Scientists Energy Bill Resource Center

“Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions: How Much at What Cost?” from McKinsey and Company

Pew Center on Global Climate Change Policy Center

Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2007

atraub — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 13:43:14 -0400

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003

atraub — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:13:12 -0400

Legislation

The middle class

Opposes

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Percentage of the President’s 2003 tax cuts that went to the top 1% income earners: 40 percent
Average tax cut received by Americans with incomes of $1.4 million and up: $81,000
Average tax cut received by middle-class Americans with incomes of $35,000: $800

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

The Middle Class Opposes: The Jobs and Growth Tax Act of 2003, enacted in May 2003, was initially portrayed as a tax cut for struggling working-class Americans, but has translated into a law favoring the rich at the expense of everyone else. While middle-class Americans with incomes of $35,000 enjoyed a tax savings of roughly $800 as a result of this law, according to the Economic Policy Institute, those with incomes above $1.4 million received a tax cut of $81,000–more than 100 times as much. In fact, over the next four years, the top one percent of income earners will receive almost 40 percent of the total tax relief from this legislation, while the bottom 60 percent of taxpayers will receive just nine percent. This law provides neither the economic support required by middle-class American families struggling with soaring fixed costs, debt, and unemployment, nor the surge in consumer spending required to stimulate the sagging economy because less than 10 percent of its benefits go to those most likely to spend it.

Tax cuts

Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008 [Revised Bill]

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Related Blog: Header

Quotes from Experts

Related Blog: Text

Beyond this Bill

Related Blog: Link

Additional Resources

Recovery Rebates and Economic Stimulus for the American People Act of 2008

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Related Blog: Header

Quotes from Experts

Related Blog: Text

Beyond this Bill

Related Blog: Link

Additional Resources

Tax Reduction and Reform Act of 2007

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Related Blog: Header

Quotes from Experts

Related Blog: Text

Beyond this Bill

Related Blog: Link

Additional Resources

Temporary Tax Relief Act of 2007

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Related Blog: Header

Quotes from Experts

Related Blog: Text

Beyond this Bill

Related Blog: Link

Additional Resources

Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Related Blog: Header

Quotes from Experts

Related Blog: Text

Beyond this Bill

Related Blog: Link

Additional Resources

Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2007

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Related Blog: Header

Quotes from Experts

Related Blog: Text

Beyond this Bill

Related Blog: Link

Additional Resources

Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003