Public infrastructure

Saving Energy Through Public Transportation Act of 2008

hmoroz — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:12:43 -0400

Legislation

The middle class

Supports

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Net oil savings from the use of public transportation in 2006, according to USPIRG: 3.4 billion gallons

Dollar amount of this savings at today’s gas prices: 13.6 billion

Amount spent by households in neighborhoods with the best access to transit routes on all transportation costs, including gas, insurance, upkeep, and transit fares: $728

Amount spent by households in neighborhoods with the least access to transit: $925

Increase in public transportation use since 1995: 32%

Price of a gallon of gasoline on June 25, 2008, the date on which President Bush issued a veto threat for the Saving Energy Through Public Transportation Act: $4.07

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

The Middle Class Supports. With gas prices hovering at $4.00 a gallon, middle-class Americans are feeling the squeeze. While there are no quick fixes, public transportation is becoming an increasingly appealing option for more middle-class Americans. A recent report shows that households with the best access to public transportation routes spends an average of $728 a month on transportation costs, while households with the worst access spend almost $200 more. The American Public Transportation Association (APTA) has found that high gas prices, congestion, and expanded public transit services have led to a 32% increase in public transportation use since 1995 and that the average annual household savings from using public transportation is $6,251. Public transportation is also an effective means to support environmental sustainability. Net oil savings from public transportation were estimated to be 3.4 billion gallons in 2006 and public transportation reduces carbon dioxide emissions by 37 million metric tons each year.

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

Transportation Resources, from Smart Growth Online

"A Bridge to Somewhere: Rethinking American Transportation for the 21st Century," from the Brookings Institution

"Squandering the Stimulus: An Analysis of Household Gas Spending, Economic Stimulus Checks, and the Need for Better Transportation Options," from USPIRG

Amendment to the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2008

hmoroz — Fri, 16 May 2008 18:23:04 -0400

Legislation

The middle class

Supports

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Approximate total award that service members can currently receive toward their education, in dollars: 39,600

Average total charges, including tuition and fees and room and board, for four years at an in-state public college or university in 2007, in dollars: 54,356

Estimated percentage of the unemployed who will be unemployed for longer than six months by the end of 2009, according to the Economic Policy Institute: 20.8

Number of states with an unemployment rate greater than 6.0% as of April 2008, including Washington D.C.: 5

Amount of stimulus produced for every $1 spent on extending emergency federal unemployment insurance benefits, in dollars: 1.64

Unemployment rate in Michigan in April 2008: 6.9%

Minimum estimated cost of the Iraq War paid by Michigan as of May 2008, in dollars: 13 billion

Estimated 10-year cost of extending unemployment insurance benefits, in dollars: 11.1 billion

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

The Middle Class Supports. The American economy remains at risk of recession and the employment picture is dim. In the first four months of 2008, the American economy lost 260,000 jobs and 400,000 workers were classified as “discouraged,” wanting work but believing that no jobs were available for them. Unemployment benefits provide direct assistance to the current and aspiring middle-class Americans likely to be hardest hit during the economic downturn. Moreover, the unemployed are most likely to spend their unemployment benefits immediately, providing an economic jolt that will enhance the stimulus generated by the tax rebates sent out earlier this year. Indeed, extension of unemployment benefits provides $1.64 in stimulus for every dollar spent, making the policy one of the most effective stimulus measures.

The “New GI Bill” measures are also important. Our nation owes those young people who have volunteered to fight for the United States a fair opportunity to enter the middle class. After World War II, the education and other benefits of the GI Bill allowed unprecedented numbers of returning soldiers to access a middle-class standard of living, but today’s GI Bill, intended for peacetime, does not provide adequate benefits. This amendment would change that. Veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars face not only the challenges of readjustment to civilian life, frequently complicated by injury or mental illness, but the rising cost of higher education impacting middle-class Americans across the United States. The current GI bill covers only 60-70% of the cost of tuition at a four-year public university and less than two years at a private college. The Amendment to the supplemental appropriations bill would permit the equivalent of full scholarships to public institutions of higher learning to any service member who completed three years of service.

Imposing a moratorium on Administration-proposed Medicaid regulations will ensure continued health care access for aspiring middle-class beneficiaries and prevent a devastating loss of funding to states, public hospitals, and local schools already struggling during the economic downturn.

The provisions that increase accountability and transparency in federal contracting are welcome, but are not as comprehensive as those included in the Accountability in Contracting Act, passed by the House last year.

The Senate version contains welcome funding for programs that benefit aspiring middle-class and middle-class Americans.

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

"Making the Case - Again - for Economic Rebound," from the Economic Policy Institute

Unemployment Insurance and the Stimulus Debate, from the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities

"A New GI Bill," from the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America

National Infrastructure Bank Act of 2007

hmoroz — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:00:40 -0500

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Quotes from Experts

Beyond this Bill

Additional Resources

Energy Policy Act of 2005

atraub — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:09:21 -0400

Legislation

The middle class

Opposes

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Total cost of tax breaks and subsidies in this bill: $85.1 billion
Earnings of oil giant ExxonMobil in the first quarter of 2005: $7.86 billion
Value of subsidies to oil and gas companies like ExxonMobil contained in this bill: $6 billion
Approximate proportion of Americans who considered high gas prices “a hardship” in April 2005, according to Gallup: 6 in 10
Retail cost of one gallon of gasoline on August 8, 2005, the day President Bush signed this bill: $2.60
Estimated amount middle-class households spent on gasoline in 2005, not including taxes: $1,778

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

The Middle Class Opposes. The most startling thing about this legislation is what it does not do. In the first place, the 1,700-page multi-billion dollar bill fails to help middle-class consumers squeezed by high gas and fuel costs. The rollback in public safety protections also puts middle-class families at risk, for example by exempting oil and gas companies from the provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act when these companies inject carcinogenic chemicals into the ground. At the same time, the deregulation of public utilities exposes the middle class to a different kind of risk: stemming from increased consolidation of utilities that could raise electric rates and manipulate energy markets. What the bill does do is provide massive taxpayer subsidies – to the tune of $85.1 billion dollars – for some of the world’s most profitable corporations, so that, among other things, they can drill on public land while paying the public less, ultimately leaving middle-class families to pick up a bigger share of the cost of public services. Finally, although the legislation comes at a time of overwhelming scientific evidence about the dangers of global warming and increased concern about the nation’s dependence on foreign oil, it does very little to address either problem, neglecting to even increase fuel efficiency standards for cars.

Public infrastructure

Saving Energy Through Public Transportation Act of 2008

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Related Blog: Header

Quotes from Experts

Related Blog: Text

Beyond this Bill

Related Blog: Link

Additional Resources

Amendment to the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2008

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Related Blog: Header

Quotes from Experts

Related Blog: Text

Beyond this Bill

Related Blog: Link

Additional Resources

National Infrastructure Bank Act of 2007

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Related Blog: Header

Quotes from Experts

Related Blog: Text

Beyond this Bill

Related Blog: Link

Additional Resources

Energy Policy Act of 2005

Legislation

The middle class

Video Summary

Injustice Facts

Overview/Summary

Middle Class Position Analysis

Related Blog: Header

Quotes from Experts

Related Blog: Text

Beyond this Bill

Related Blog: Link

Additional Resources